By Jaakko Stenros and Markus Montola
On Thursday, Worldcon 75, one of the most prestigious conventions on scifi and fantasy, suddenly banned a freeform role-playing game scenario A Home for the Old from its program. The scenario was removed from the games track due to criticism on Twitter, based on the program description. The criticism related to the subject matter of the work, Alzheimer’s disease, which was perceived as being made fun of.
This is the first time, to our knowledge, that a role-playing game, larp, or a freeform scenario has been banned in Finland. Although no-one denies the Worldcon’s right to curate its programme, the decision has been criticized by the Nordic role-playing community.
In this blog post we attempt to provide an account of what happened, strive to understand the cultural values in conflict, and tease out some ideas about how to do better in the future.
A Home for the Old is a role-play scenario designed by Fredrik Berg, a multiple award-winning Danish designer who has, over the past two decades, created a significant body of work in role-playing. His works often address delicate topics such as bullying, parenting norms, and discourses around obesity and anorexia. Using the role-play form he often makes the participants confront their own unease with the difficult topics. Ironically, his works could be well analysed with Viktor Shklovsky’s ideas of ostranenie (estrangement) — which was the theme of the academic track of Worldcon 75.
After discussing the situation with the Finnish program facilitator, numerous members of the program committee of Worldcon, and people who made the call to pull the program, this is our best understanding of what happened. As our aim is not to cast blame, we will not name individuals aside from Berg, who considers himself publicly accountable for his creative works.
A Home for the Old premiered at the Danish freeform role-playing convention Fastaval in 2013. The scenario was run at Tracon Hitpoint in Finland in March 2017. The Worldcon 75 program team curating the game track found the scenario interesting and requested a Finnish person to game master (facilitate) the run in Worldcon. The same blurb, although re-translated, that was used in Fastaval and Tracon Hitpoint, was used in the Wordcon programme.
On the second day of the Worldcon, a few people started to object to the presence of the larp, based on the programme blurb. The social media team noticed these tweets and brought them to the attention of the Worldcon team responsible for safety and code of conduct (“Turva”) at the event.
Based on the information on the programme, the convention chairs with the support of the Turva team, made the decision to pull the item since,
(a) Worldcon is not primarily a games convention and thus games are not at the core of it and the majority of the attendees are not familiar with Nordic role-playing,
(b) the scenario addresses a delicate subject, and
(c) since A Home for the Old does not feature written characters but gives agency to the player to bring in their own creations, there is a possibility that all of the players would not treat the subject in the appropriate gravity.
The programme committee was not present when the decision was initially made, and there was no attempt to discuss the situation with the Finnish facilitator of the game.
The facilitator was given forewarning on Friday before noon via email and soon after the decision was announced publicly on the official Worldcon Facebook page. The convention apologized that it had included the larp in the first place.
The cancellation announcement stated that the convention acknowledges that the topic of A Home for the Old “is not suitable one”, got the name of the work wrong, and incorrectly claimed that the larp was submitted to Worldcon (while it actually was invited). The statement has been updated three times since, and different stakeholders were included in the dialogue to improve it.
On Friday the discussion on the topic continued in social media, where misunderstandings spread fast. For example, one tweeter wrote that the “scenario is ‘you are in an old folks home, have Alzheimer’s, and think you’re one of your RPG characters, hilarity ensues’.” Afterwards some were under the impression that “hilarity ensues” was a quote from the program description when in fact it was an interpretation of a tweeter.
However, now there were people also defending A Home for the Old on Facebook and Twitter and criticizing the actions of Worldcon. Many Nordic role-players found the statement’s tone condescending and rife with cultural imperialism — of Anglo-Americans trying to ‘civilize the natives’ by instilling their moral conventions on a subculture they clearly failed to understand.
No benefit of the doubt was given, and there was an aura of assuming that the Nordic creators had obviously not thought about the implications of their little games — simply because the usual phrases relating to identity politics were not foregrounded in the blurb. The idea that a creative work can just be cast aside, censored, with no debate, based on rather flimsy basis, was found appalling by many Nordic people deeply invested in the role-playing culture. A Home for the Old, and by extension the Nordic role-playing culture, was cast as not worthy of debate.
(Finland has the highest incidence of Alzheimer’s in the world.)
All of this is in stark contrast with the Nordic and Finnish cultural context, where larps, role-playing games, and games in general, are considered valuable works worthy of analysis, criticism, respect, and debate. Role-playing is a form of artistic expression that continues to gain momentum and respect.
For example, in January 2017 the Finnish Museum of Games was opened in Tampere to preserve, exhibit, and study Finnish games. The core collection of the museum includes numerous tabletop role-playing games and two larps.
Similarly, the public discourse see games as a medium where complex ideas can be explored. Most recently this was visible a fortnight ago, as the culture section of Helsingin Sanomat (the largest newspaper in the Nordic countries), devoted a full page to a story on Miska Fredman’s multi-layered role-playing game Sotakarjut (“Warhogs”), and how the death of his child influenced that game.
In this context the decision made by Worldcon 75 to pull A Home for the Old from its program appears outrageous.
Obviously this is not the first time Nordic role-play runs into these kinds of attitudes. The idea that games are always light and fun is a strong one. The idea that games are ultimately trivial, and thus if they attempt to address sensitive topics they automatically trivialize them, does surface from time to time. An example of this is the public discussion on the culture pages of Swedish Aftonbladet tabloid in 2011 when Just a Little Lovin’, a larp about the HIV epidemic devastating the New York gay scene in the early 1980s, was announced. Based on the webpages of the larp which was yet to be played, a cultural journalist interpreted it as exoticism of basking in glory of aestheticized tragedy. (Tova Gerge has written an account.) The latter runs of Just a Little Lovin’ have paid very close attention to their websites, and the Nordic role-play community should have learned this lesson by now.
Our take-away for the Nordic role-players is that we need to learn to write for outsider audiences. At Fastaval it is obvious that play is a powerful tool for exploring difficult topics. At Worldcon a more serious framing is needed.
Our take-away for Worldcon is that we hope that Worldcon will be better at recognizing games as a deeply meaningful expressive medium.